|
|
Website URL : http://www.ucu.org.uk/index.cfm?articleid=5736
||
![]() University staff vote for 'sustained campaign of industrial action' as employers impose pension cuts14 September 2011 67 of the UK's biggest universities and over one million students affected • Vote follows imposition of two-tier pension system without members' agreement • Staff face six figure losses from pension pots As more unions signal their intent to ballot members over changes to pension schemes, members of UCU in the Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS) have today voted for a campaign of sustained industrial action in protest at the imposition of changes to their pensions. USS, which is the second largest private pension scheme in the UK, is imposing changes on its members which include:
Over three-quarters (77%) of UCU members who voted, voted for the sustained campaign of industrial action. The union is now discussing a long-term national plan of action with its branches. The action is likely to begin in mid-October and UCU warned today that it will continue until there is a breakthrough. Actions under consideration to start the campaign include working-to-contract and working-to-rule. If the employers still refuse to negotiate then the union will consider setting exams but not marking them and, if required, escalating the action to include a full assessment boycott. UCU members also voted in favour of strike action, which the union said may be a feature of its campaign. UCU said an increased turnout compared to the last ballot, despite the fact that the vote took place during the summer months, was evidence of members' strong feelings. The union said the employers had waged a campaign of misinformation, including a taxpayer-subsidised advert aimed at persuading staff the scheme was in trouble based on a snapshot of its value, rather than a proper valuation. Last month leaked documents revealed that any deficit in the USS scheme was expected to be lower than publicly predicted. UCU general secretary, Sally Hunt, said: 'These changes have been imposed without the agreement of staff, and our vote shows members are determined to defend their pension rights. Despite a taxpayer-funded campaign of misinformation, staff know that the imposition of these detrimental changes are wholly unnecessary. 'Industrial action is always a last resort for educators and we will work closely with students to minimise problems where possible. However, the nature of any industrial dispute means disruption and there will be widespread and sustained disruption unless USS is prepared to return to the negotiating table. 'Today I once again repeat my plea to the employers to turn away from a policy of imposition without agreement. Without real and meaningful negotiations our universities, and those who work and study in them, will suffer, which is in no one's interests.' notes UCU members in the USS scheme work in the pre-92 universities, often described as the 'traditional' universities (a full list is below). Around 40,000 academic and academic-related staff were balloted. UCU members in further education colleges and the new post-92, or 'modern' universities are in the Teachers' Pension Scheme, and are part of the current dispute with government over changes to public sector pensions. UCU members in the TPS scheme voted for strike action earlier this year and took strike action at the end of June. That ballot is still valid, should the need arise for further industrial action this autumn. Result:
The full list of universities that will face disruption as part of the USS dispute are:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comments
Comment on this pageOnly 18% Favour a Strike
So 58% of members failed to vote at all. And only 18% of UCU membership were in favour of a strike. That's union democracy for you!
Problems with passivity
Hi Rankin, I make it 23.74% of those balloted actively voting in favour of strike action. Regardless, the passive involvement of most members is a problem and I would suggest that moving ahead with a strike given the nature and level of support will not provide the strength we need. The action will also likely be one-day strikes, which are ineffective and encourage further passivity (members work from home or take the opportunity to do some shopping). Without some effort to increase active participation in the union, I don't see how we can win. Other thoughts?
RPI-reat in peace?
What a pity those receiving a pension were not included in the ballot. We had the link for our earned and now paid pensions changed from RPI to CPI. No talk by the employer or USS about the saving that is or will make for them. No voice for the pensioners, and no adjustments to the actuarial assessment that was made prior to this link being wiped out by the government.
Retrospective theft!!!
USS meeting
We had a USS presentation at our University recently about the changes coming in from 1st October 2011. It was quite obvious that a lot of people had not really thought about this until it was spelled out to them. In particular the yearly increases in contributions from employees and the changed redundancy conditions were causing concern. Our managers have told us that we have to let them know if were are intending to strike. Last time there was a strike we were told by UCU that we did not have to inform them. Is this still the case?
All talk no action
This is why I left British HE: all talk no action.
For years it was "labour will help us." How did a decade of that work out?
How high would they have to raise the denominator for you to strike?
I predict you will never strike.
informing management of your intention to strike
Hi Sarah
You do not have to inform your employer as an individual if you intend to strike. UCU usually gives the number based on the membership who will be out on the day and that is as far as their obligation goes. Some people like to tell their employer to be fair to them but this can defeat the object as they can arrange cover in areas where they know someone will be off..
Comment on this page