*  
Association of University Teachers
 
ONLINE DOCUMENT
 

Special Educational Needs and Disability Act 2001 (SENDA)

 

Disability Discrimination Legislation Extends to Education from 1 September 2002

From 1 September 2002 Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) are prohibited by law from discriminating against disabled students and other disabled people. Under the Special Needs and Disability Act (SENDA) that forms Part IV of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA), there is a requirement that all public educational establishments must not treat a disabled person 'less favourably' than a none-disabled one, without 'justification'. This extends to all services that are provided for students including teaching, leisure facilities and accommodation.

The Act applies to people who are disabled according to the definition of disability in the DDA. A disabled person is someone who has a physical or mental impairment, which has an effect on his or her ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities. The effects must be substantial, long-term and adverse to be covered by the Act though they not be obviously apparent, such as dyslexia, Asperger syndrome, epilepsy, diabetes and mental health problems.

The new legislation goes beyond the requirement for the provision of a disability statement and imposes an obligation on the employer to make 'reasonable adjustments', to ensure that a disabled student is not placed at a 'substantial disadvantage'. Ultimate responsibility for complying with the Act lies with the governing body of an HEI, and universities and colleges should be informing their staff of any adjustments they might have to make, and delivering the training necessary for them to make them.

To supplement the legislation the Disability Rights Commission (DRC) has produced a Code of Practice Post-16. Even though the Code is not a legal document the Courts are expected to refer to it when hearing complaints of discrimination. The Code contains examples that demonstrate how different sections of the Act might be breached, and explanations of how its terminology might be interpreted. It is available to download from the DRC's website at www.drc-gb.org/drc/campaigns/page431.asp.

SENDA Compliance in Higher Education[1] is the result of work done by a HEFCE funded project involving nine higher education institutions in the South West which was co-ordinated and managed by the Disability Assist Services at the University of Plymouth. This publication contains checklists on admissions; course development, programme planning, approval and review; preparing documents for printing, visual display and electronic dissemination; fieldwork; laboratories and workshops and other-practice-based environments; placement learning; assessment; and lectures, seminars and tutorials, reproduced below. The checklists provide a useful audit tool for staff to determine the particular adjustments necessary to comply with the legislation. The full document can be downloaded from www.plym.ac.uk/pages/view.asp?page=3243.

SENDA compliance in higher education

Checklist - Lectures, seminars and tutorials

Overall procedure

What is the overall procedure for ensuring that the delivery of lectures and seminars/tutorials is flexible and versatile to meet the individual needs of students with a range of disabilities?

By what method do staff become aware of the implications of a particular disability on an individual student's teaching and learning needs, and in particular the 'reasonable adjustments' required for lectures and seminars?

Is targeted disability awareness training available for full and part-time staff, from the disability support service? Who initiates the sessions? Who attends?

The availability of supporting materials

Is the course documentation made available well in advance of lectures/seminars and has a systematic approach been taken to make it available in an accessible format for a range of disabilities?

Organising the teaching space

Has an opportunity been made to meet or discuss with students any necessary 'reasonably adjustments' that need to be made? Whose responsibility is this?

Is the time tabling of teaching space supported by a reliable access audit and is the allocation suitable and accessible to the disabled students?

What arrangements are to be made where the following apply:

  • that some students may utilise assistive technology or employ medical and non-medical helpers to support them
  • that a wheelchair user does not want to feel marginalised by a lecture or seminar room layout?
  • that a student with a speech impairment may want another student to ask their questions?
  • that students may require additional support to prepare a presentation?
  • that having two people talking at once will disadvantage someone with a hearing impairment?
  • that a lip reader or student with a visual impairment may want to be introduced to the student group and have ground rules set down for communication, etc?
  • the students and sign language interpreters may need short rest breaks?

Are all presentation areas suitably lit eg is it possible to avoid back or side lighting from windows or other light sources, and how are task lights supplied when necessary?

Teaching and learning strategies

Is positive communication employed eg by facing the student group when speaking, avoiding obscuring the face by hands or gestures and are staff aware that beards, microphones and books can be obstructive to lip readers?

Are a variety of teaching and learning methods to be used, supported by accessible written and visual material, eg

  • Positive communication
  • Whiteboards
  • OHP transparencies
  • Electronic presentation packages
  • Audio-visuals, etc
  • Invitations for student input?

Is the material displayed on electronic presentation packages, OHP transparencies and whiteboards etc including graphs and charts, explained orally? Are they available in written form for transcribing purposes?

Is complex information summarised through bullet-pointed summaries?

Will plain language be used when speaking and to explain specialist terminology, thus avoiding jargon and colloquialisms?

Will strategies be used to re-iterate key points, re-phrase information that is likely to be misunderstood and re-emphasise questions asked by students?

Will in-session announcements be produced in written and electronic formats, eg concerning the content of future sessions, venues and times including amendments, arrangements for fieldwork, etc?

Will students be encouraged to make tape recordings of lectures and seminars if required?

In-class assessments

Where in-class assessments are scheduled have 'reasonable adjustment' been made to self and peer assessment, group work, problem-based assessment, optical mark recognition and other computer-based assessment systems, etc?

Post lecture and seminar activities

Will course material be posted on the intranet and will email aide-mémoires be used for students who may have been absent for disability related reasons? Is there a chat room that can be used for this purpose?

Student evaluation

Is there a system in place for disabled students to evaluate the learning opportunities provided by lectures/seminars?

Action for Local Associations

Has your institution informed all members of staff about the legislation?

Are training courses being run for staff to ensure that they know what their obligations are under the Act and how to meet them?

Do staff know who to contact if they have any questions about their obligations?

Do staff know what the procedures are regarding confidentiality and dissemination when a student discloses a disability?

Are disability issues regularly on the agenda of staff meetings, faculty/school committees and senior management bodies for resource allocation, cascading good practice, monitoring and review?

Does AUT have representation on the university committee that considers disabled issues?

AUT
January 2003

[1] SENDA Compliance in Higher Education, Waterfield, J and West, B, University of Plymouth/HEFCE  

tel: 020 7670 9700 | fax: 020 7670 9799 | e-mail: hq@aut.org.uk  © AUT 1996-2003